· 12/6/1985
Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.
Citations
- 710 P.2d 1297
- 238 Kan. 384
- 1985 Kan. LEXIS 520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- writing that “[t]he fact that a retail commercial enterprise offers for sale a particular product does not indicate that the retailer is the agent of the manufacturer”
- which approved of the decision in Owens-Coming Fiberglas v. Sonic Development Corp.
- discussing “express agency,” “implied agency,” and “ostensible or apparent agency”
- affirming grant of summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.