Skip to main content
· 12/6/1985

Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.

Citations

  • 710 P.2d 1297
  • 238 Kan. 384
  • 1985 Kan. LEXIS 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • writing that “[t]he fact that a retail commercial enterprise offers for sale a particular product does not indicate that the retailer is the agent of the manufacturer”
  • which approved of the decision in Owens-Coming Fiberglas v. Sonic Development Corp.
  • discussing “express agency,” “implied agency,” and “ostensible or apparent agency”
  • affirming grant of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.