· 9/25/1984
Prodyne Enterprises, Inc. v. Julie Pomerantz, Inc.
Citations
- 743 F.2d 1581
- 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 477
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The doctrine of prosecution history estoppel precludes a patent owner from obtaining a claim construction that would resurrect subject matter surrendered during the prosecution of his patent application.\
- \Prodyne is estopped from now broadening the description of a claim element limited during prosecution so as to encompass a structure which a competitor should reasonably be entitled to believe is not within the legal boundaries of the patent claims in suit.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedman, Rich, Cowen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.