Skip to main content
· 9/25/1984

Prodyne Enterprises, Inc. v. Julie Pomerantz, Inc.

Citations

  • 743 F.2d 1581
  • 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 477
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The doctrine of prosecution history estoppel precludes a patent owner from obtaining a claim construction that would resurrect subject matter surrendered during the prosecution of his patent application.\
  • \Prodyne is estopped from now broadening the description of a claim element limited during prosecution so as to encompass a structure which a competitor should reasonably be entitled to believe is not within the legal boundaries of the patent claims in suit.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Rich, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.