Skip to main content
· 1/5/1988

Producers Cotton Oil Co. v. Amstar Corp.

Citations

  • 197 Cal. App. 3d 638
  • 242 Cal. Rptr. 914
  • 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 32
  • 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding beet buyer who wrongfully set off harvesting costs in violation of section 9-318 and converted beets in violation of continuing security interest nevertheless not liable because liability would unjustly enrich secured party
  • holding beet buyer who wrongfully set off harvesting costs in violation of section 9-318 and converted beets in violation of continuing security interest nevertheless not liable because liability would unjustly enrich secured party
  • beet purchaser who set off harvesting costs not buyer in ordinary course because “[n]o new value was given”
  • beet purchaser who set off harvesting costs not buyer in ordinary course because \[n]o new value was given\
  • money from sale of collateral was proceeds even though never actually received by debtor but by third party
  • court found modification not commercially reasonable and motivated by bad faith where modifi cation was account debtor's last ditch effort to avoid liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone (w.A.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.