prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,906 Lauren David Thornton v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “any insufficiency in the warning label was not the proximate cause of [the plaintiff’s] injuries” where the plaintiff “had the opportunity to read the label and failed to do so”
• “[I]n this case, the facts support only one conclusion, that is, the warning and its communication were adequate”
• “[The plaintiff] was contributorily negligent by failing to read the warning, therefore, any insufficiency in the warning label is not the proximate cause of his injuries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).