Skip to main content
· 8/20/1987

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,487 Charles Vickers v. Chiles Drilling Co. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Citations

  • 822 F.2d 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Restatement (Second) of Torts for principles of product liability law
  • normal use of product includes all reasonably foreseeable uses, including foreseeable misuse
  • applying § 402A to a maritime products liability claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Williams, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.