prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,182 Albert C. Anderson and Olive Anderson v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in warranty action, “Massachusetts law requires a seller to warn only of reasonably foreseeable or scientifically discoverable dangers”
• the ALJ has a burden to “set out a detailed and thorough summary of the 6 facts and conflicting clinical evidence, stating his interpretation thereof, and making findings”
• “Swain is cited by the California Supreme Court to indicate that 6 claims have not been alleged with sufficient particularity. That deficiency, when it exists, can be 7 cured in a renewed petition.”
• “the seller is required to give warning against [a danger that is not generally known], if he has knowledge, or by the application of reasonable, developed human skill and foresight should have knowledge, of the presence of the ingredient and the danger”
• no warranty duty to warn of generally known dangers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).