Skip to main content

Proctor v. State

Citations

  • 205 So. 3d 784
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a verdict was truly inconsistent where the jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a person over sixty- five but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm5
  • holding that a verdict was truly inconsistent where the jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a person over sixty- five but also made a special finding that the defendant did not possess a firearm5
  • finding a charge and a special finding directly negating a necessary element of that charge to be “legally interlocking”
  • finding a charge and a special finding directly negating a necessary element of that charge to be “legally interlocking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morris, Silberman, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.