Proctor v. Fombelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course and thus, the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her preexisting condition”
• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course, and thus the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her preexisting condition”
• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course and thus, the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her preexisting condition”
• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course and thus, the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her preexisting condition”
• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course and thus, the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her pre-existing condition”
• finding that “the vaccinations would not have changed her clinical course and thus, the vaccinations did not significantly aggravate her preexisting condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).