· 3/18/2002
Proctor v. Cockrell
Citations
- 283 F.3d 726
- 2002 WL 264778
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that because “Carmell was decided after the TCCA rendered its decision in this case ... [it could] not properly be considered a part of ‘clearly established’ Supreme Court law at the time of the TCCA’s decision”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Davis, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.