Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. And Scm Corporation v. C. F. Rollins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there were no countervailing federal considerations because the plaintiff could have sued in “North Carolina, the state of the Defendant’s incorporation.”
• noting that the crucial question when applying 15-5-150 is whether South Carolina might be the only state in which a party could join multiple defendants
• holding that the Door Closing Statute barred the lawsuit
• holding that the Door-Closing Statute barred the lawsuit
• Georgia plaintiff suing Pennsylvania and New York defendants for Georgia injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).