Skip to main content
· 10/27/1998

Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Co. v. Viskoza-Loznica

Citations

  • 33 F. Supp. 2d 644
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19981
  • 1998 WL 897082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An objection under Rule 12(b)(4) concerns the form of process rather than the manner or method of its service. Technically, therefore, a Rule 12(b)(4) motion is proper only to challenge non- compliance with the provisions of [Rule 4(a)] . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.