Skip to main content
· 4/7/1982

Processed Plastic Company, Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Warner Communications, Inc., and Warner Bros., Inc., Counterplaintiff-Appellee

Citations

  • 675 F.2d 852
  • 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1072
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if the infringer’s products are of high quality, the plaintiff can properly insist that its reputation should not be imperiled by the acts of another.”
  • public must assume that product comes from a “single though anonymous source”
  • “This and many other Courts have often recognized that the damages occasioned by trademark infringement are by their very nature irreparable and not susceptible of adequate measurement for remedy at law.”
  • “This and many other Courts have often recognized that the damages occasioned by trademark infringement are by their very nature irreparable and not susceptible of adequate measurement for remedy at law.”
  • after a company intentionally copied a toy car, that company did not suffer hardship because, inter alia, it “cannot now complain that having to mend its ways would be too expensive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Pell, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.