Processed Plastic Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court No. 10-00067 Page 16 principal use of a “toy” is amusement, diversion, or play value rather than practicality
• noting that the Carborundum factors “are simply areas of inquiry that may prove useful in determining what is the principal use of merchandise alleged to be a ‘toy.’”
• “We agree with the standard adopted in Minnetonka to deter- mine whether merchandise should be classified as a toy.”
• discussing the tariff term “Other toys”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2009-01-23· cited 60×
• Storewall, LLC v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2011-03-31· cited 28×
• Drygel, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 21×
• Nucor Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2008-12-23· cited 17×
• Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2017-09-21· cited 9×
• P & K Contracting, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-12-21· cited 6×
• Streetsurfing LLC v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2014-09-22· cited 5×
• Sc Johnson & Son Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2021-06-02· cited 4×
• Brown v. BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
  S.D. Texas· 2009-07-20· cited 3×
• GRK Canada, Ltd. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2016-07-15· cited 3×
• Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2017-04-12· cited 3×
• S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2018-09-14· cited 3×
• Applikon Biotechnology, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2011-12-12· cited 2×
• Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2017-05-17· cited 2×
• George Family Trust ex rel. George v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-02-08· cited 2×
• United States v. Great American Insurance Co. of New York
  Court of International Trade· 2017-05-18· cited 2×
• Apple Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2019-03-11· cited 2×
• United States v. Farhan Khan
  Court of International Trade· 2017-07-13· cited 1×
• Mondiv, Div. of Lassonde Specialties Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2018-08-16· cited 1×
• In Zone Brands, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2020-05-05· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-03-26· cited 470×
• Applied Companies v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1998-05-27· cited 71×
• Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2006-07-17· cited 70×
• Totes, Incorporated v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 60×
• Rollerblade, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-03-05· cited 53×
• Minnetonka Brands, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2000-07-24· cited 20×
• Austin Chemical Company, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-12-31· cited 11×

Other cases named Processed Plastic Co. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Processed Plastic Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2005-09-06· cited 8×