Processed Plastic Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court No. 10-00067 Page 16 principal use of a “toy” is amusement, diversion, or play value rather than practicality
• noting that the Carborundum factors “are simply areas of inquiry that may prove useful in determining what is the principal use of merchandise alleged to be a ‘toy.’”
• “We agree with the standard adopted in Minnetonka to deter- mine whether merchandise should be classified as a toy.”
• discussing the tariff term “Other toys”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).