ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that terms inside a box of software bind consumers who use the software after an opportunity to read the terms and to reject them by returning the product
• holding that terms inside a software box bind consumers who use the software after an opportunity to read the terms and reject them by returning the product
• holding that computer software program is \tangible medium of expression\ and protected by Copyright Act
• holding that a licensing agreement was not preempted, and reasoning that “[a] copyright is a right against the world. Contracts, by contrast, generally affect only their parties[.]”
• holding that terms inside a box of software bind consumers who use the software after an opportunity to read the terms and to reject them by returning the product
• holding shrinkwrap license agreement was a valid form of contracting under U.C.C. section 2-204

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).