Procce v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that if appellant’s Rule 1925(b) statement was late, “we would be obligated as a matter of our rules of procedure to deem appellate counsel ineffective and to remand for the filing of a Statement nunc pro tunc.”
• observing that if an appellant's Rule 1925(b) statement were late, “we would be obligated as a matter of our rules of procedure to deem appellate counsel ineffective and to remand for the filing of a Statement nunc pro tunc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).