Probst v. STATE DEPT. OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “appellate courts avoid deciding constitutional issues where case may be fairly resolved on other grounds” (citing Cmty. Telecable of Seattle, Inc. v. City of Seattle, Dep’t of Exec. Admin., 164 Wn.2d 35, 41, 186 P.3d 1032 (2008))
• describing PERS 2 as a “defined benefit plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).