Probst v. Hinesley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting existing parties’ “opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to amend likely sets forth all the reasons why the court could deny the motion,” and rejecting argument that plaintiffs “did not follow the procedures” in L.R. 15.1(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).