· 9/27/2011
Pro-Pac, Inc. v. Chapes (In Re Pro-Pac, Inc.)
Citations
- 456 B.R. 894
- 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 3678
- 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 152
- 2011 WL 4469973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Stem “holding constitutes a clear rejection of Defendant’s argument that one cannot consent to the authority (constitutional or otherwise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Susan v. Kelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.