Skip to main content
· 9/27/2011

Pro-Pac, Inc. v. Chapes (In Re Pro-Pac, Inc.)

Citations

  • 456 B.R. 894
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 3678
  • 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 152
  • 2011 WL 4469973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Stem “holding constitutes a clear rejection of Defendant’s argument that one cannot consent to the authority (constitutional or otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susan v. Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.