Pro Ftbl Inc v. Harjo, Suzan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that assertion of laches as a defense “requires proof of (1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The Lanham Trademark Act provides protection to trademark owners ... [who] must register their marks with the Patent and Trademark Office”
• “While retaining jurisdiction over the case, we remand the record to the district court for the purpose of evaluating whether laches bars [plaintiffs] claim.”
• defense of laches “requires proof of (1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).