Privilege Yachting, Inc. v. Teed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A possessory action permits a party to adjudicate the right to possession of property that has been wrongfully taken.”
• plaintiff was really asserting a breach of contract claim and could not obtain admiralty jurisdiction merely by invoking Rule D without showing entitlement to make petitory or possessory claims
• “A petitory suit is an action to try title to a vessel. In order to bring petitory suit, the Plaintiff must assert legal title to the vessel. The assertion of equitable title alone is not sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• GULF COAST SHELL AND AGGREGATE LP v. Newlin
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-10-06· cited 12×
• Hideo Matsuda v. Michiko Wada
  D. Hawaii· 2000-10-03· cited 12×
• Trueman v. the Historic Steamtug New York
  N.D. New York· 2000-10-23· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• J.A.R., Inc. v. M/v Lady Lucille, the Dinner Cruise/excursion Vessel, Etc., Network Marine, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-06-19· cited 32×
• Silver v. the Sloop Silver Cloud
  S.D. New York· 1966-08-23· cited 32×
• Cary Marine, Inc. v. The Motorvessel Papillon, Great Lakes Cary Corporation, Donald B. McCann and Third Party Randy Postma, Third Party
  Third Circuit· 1989-04-18· cited 18×
• Ramsay Scarlett & Co., Inc. v. SS Koh Eun
  E.D. Virginia· 1978-12-12· cited 11×