Pritsker v. Brudnoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statements critical of restaurant, including that owners were “unconscionably rude and vulgar people,” were non-actionable opinions
• finding statement by restaurant critic that restaurant owners were “pigs” pure opinion
• finding statement by restaurant critic that restaurant owners were “pigs” pure opinion
• “mixed” statements of opinion and fact are actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Pritsker v. Brudnoy

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Pritsker v. Brudnoy
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1981-07-14