Pritchard v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 311(d)(2)(A), regarding belated suppression motions, “should be liberally construed in favor of permitting an accused the right to be heard fully in his defense”
• recognizing military accused’s right to fully present his defense
• recognizing military accused’s right to fully present his defense
• trial counsel’s intentional failure to disclose evidence does not inevitably require sanction that evidence be excluded
• court member who knew accused and had been present at formation where accused was apprehended and accused of being drug dealer “should not have sat” on case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).