Pritchard v. Dow Agro Sciences

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion before close of discovery when party served responses less than seven days late
• applying Rule 36 to permit withdrawal of admissions because they were inconsistent with the rest of the record before the court
• finding deemed admissions that were inconsistent with the record weighed in favor of withdrawal in evaluating the first requisite of Rule 36
• defining prejudice as a need to suddenly obtain new evidence to prove previously deemed admissions
• applying the procedure for withdrawal of admission pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Pro. 36(b)
• Rule 36’s extension provisions for requests to admit apply rather than Rule 6’s general provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stimmler v. Chestnut Hill Hospital
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-09-30· cited 70×
• Trask v. Olin Corp.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-03-04· cited 38×
• Pritchard v. Dow Argo Sciences
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-11-12· cited 21×
• Pritchard v. Dow Agro Sciences
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-03-11· cited 18×
• Janet K. Sanford v. Walter Dudley
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2016-07-19· cited 5×
• C.J. Hughes Constr. Co. v. Eqm Gathering Opco, LLC
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-02-14· cited 2×
• In re Wolf
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-09-15· cited 2×
• Mejia v. Cathedral Lane LLC
  District of Columbia· 2022-04-25

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
  Third Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 2,455×
• Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1987-01-30· cited 362×
• Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems Division
  First Circuit· 1982-08-20· cited 154×
• Lynne Koplove and Jay S. Koplove v. Ford Motor Company
  Third Circuit· 1986-08-14· cited 107×
• Hewlett v. Davis
  Third Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 61×
• Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
  D. Delaware· 1988-11-29· cited 31×
• United States v. Branella
  D. New Jersey· 1997-08-07· cited 28×
• Essex Builders Group, Inc. v. Amerisure Insurance
  M.D. Florida· 2005-09-07· cited 25×
• Matrix Motor Co. v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
  C.D. California· 2003-04-25· cited 22×
• Rabil v. Swafford
  District of Columbia· 1989-10-23· cited 20×
• Kleckner v. Glover Trucking Corp.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-10-31· cited 19×
• Davis v. Noufal
  District of Columbia· 1992-05-18· cited 16×
• St. Regis Paper Co. v. Upgrade Corp.
  W.D. Michigan· 1980-02-20· cited 13×
• Flohr v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-03-05· cited 12×
• McElyea v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-03-06· cited 4×
• Republic Savings Bank v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-06-25· cited 3×
• Eastwood v. DeDomenico (In Re DeDomenico)
  N.D. California· 2002-05-15· cited 2×
• Home Insurance v. Law Offices of Jonathan Deyoung, P.C.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-06-15· cited 1×