· 2/25/1991
Prior v. S. C. Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'n
Citations
- 407 S.E.2d 655
- 305 S.C. 247
- 1991 S.C. App. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the notice-prejudice rule does not apply when there is no innocent third party and the underlying plaintiff has already been compensated
- holding the notice-prejudice rule does not apply when there is no innocent third party and the underlying plaintiff has already been compensated
- discussing an insurer’s duty to defend and stating “[i]n examining the complaint, we must look beyond the labels describing the acts, to the acts themselves which form the basis of the claim against the insurer”
- “No rule of law is more firmly established in this jurisdiction than that one suing on a policy of insurance, where the notice required by the policy is not timely given, cannot recover....”
- “No rule of law is more firmly established in this jurisdiction than that one suing on a policy of insurance, where the notice required by the policy is not timely given, cannot recover....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.