Skip to main content
· 2/25/1991

Prior v. S. C. Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'n

Citations

  • 407 S.E.2d 655
  • 305 S.C. 247
  • 1991 S.C. App. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the notice-prejudice rule does not apply when there is no innocent third party and the underlying plaintiff has already been compensated
  • holding the notice-prejudice rule does not apply when there is no innocent third party and the underlying plaintiff has already been compensated
  • discussing an insurer’s duty to defend and stating “[i]n examining the complaint, we must look beyond the labels describing the acts, to the acts themselves which form the basis of the claim against the insurer”
  • “No rule of law is more firmly established in this jurisdiction than that one suing on a policy of insurance, where the notice required by the policy is not timely given, cannot recover....”
  • “No rule of law is more firmly established in this jurisdiction than that one suing on a policy of insurance, where the notice required by the policy is not timely given, cannot recover....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.