Skip to main content
· 1/5/1987

Printing Mart-Morristown, Inc. v. Rosenthal

Citations

  • 650 F. Supp. 1444
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he entire controversy doctrine applies both to subsequent actions asserting different legal theories and those requesting alternative relief.\
  • a prior judgment “‘cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not ... exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case’ ”
  • a prior judgment \ 'cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not ... exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sarokin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.