Pringle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absent proffer of what the testimony of an expert would have been at trial, defendant cannot show that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different had his counsel hired an expert
• police officer described victim as visibly shaken, scared and jittery
• police officer described victim as visibly shaken, scared and jittery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-07-08· cited 26×
• Long v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-20· cited 12×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-23· cited 10×
• Ware v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-02-10· cited 7×
• CRUZ v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-10-26· cited 6×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-24
• David Heath Long v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-20

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-06-07· cited 61×
• Domingues v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-11-17· cited 60×
• Buruca v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-14· cited 43×
• Hampton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-09-19· cited 30×
• Hudson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-09-21· cited 27×
• Cupe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-01-25· cited 26×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-14· cited 26×
• Ware v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-23· cited 25×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-26· cited 16×
• Sprayberry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-12-15· cited 3×