California Court of Appeal· 7/28/1999
Pringle v. La Chapelle
Citations
- 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 90
- 73 Cal. App. 4th 1000
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 7675
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6051
- 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the denial of attorneys’ fees may be appropriate where “the purported violation of the rules was serious, if any act was inconsistent with the character of the profession, or if there was an irreconcilable conflict”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerNinth Circuit· 2012-08-10· cited 99×
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-18· cited 76×
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-05-24· cited 61×
- Fuller v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-11-17· cited 49×
- Westoil Terminals Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 2003-07-03· cited 26×
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-03-25· cited 19×
- AI Credit Corp. v. Aguilar & SebastinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-11-25· cited 19×
- Lewis v. Youtube, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-01-25· cited 19×
- In Re Marriage of FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-07-15· cited 18×
- McLaughlin v. Walnut Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-06-10· cited 13×
- Sullivan v. DorsaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-04-25· cited 7×
- Westoil Terminals v. Industrial Indem.California Court of Appeal· 2003-07-03
- Hance v. Super Store IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-01-23
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-11-03· cited 666×
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-04-03· cited 606×
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-07-10· cited 181×
- People v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-11-17· cited 82×
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-03-28· cited 73×
- Bernard v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-01-15· cited 62×
- Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1997-01-16· cited 59×
- Jeffry v. PoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-02-09· cited 55×
- Cosenza v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-03-12· cited 31×
- County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-17· cited 17×
- Arditto v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-05-25· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.