Pringle v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating FAS letters as part of the Agreement for Yard-Man purposes where defendant stipulated that the letters were amendments to the plan
• “the very fact that the benefits at issue belong to retirees creates an inference (but not a presumption) that such benefits are ‘intended ... to continue as long as the beneficiary remains a retiree.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).