Pringle v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “no 16 reasonable trier of fact would find that Plaintiffs are similarly-situated to the Towing Defendants 17 in the necessary material respects”
• finding that “no 16 reasonable trier of fact would find that Plaintiffs are similarly-situated to the Towing Defendants 17 in the necessary material respects”
• rejecting defendants’ arguments that nuisance conditions on a 17 property constituted an emergency
• granting summary judgment in favor of city on property owners’ class- 19 of-one claim because plaintiff property owners had not met burden to show they were similarly 20 situated in all material respects to comparators
• “[T]o be considered similarly situated, the class of one challenger and his comparators must be prima facie identical in all relevant respects or directly comparable in all material respects.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “[T]o be considered similarly situated, the class of one challenger and his comparators must be prima facie identical in all relevant respects or directly comparable in all material respects.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).