Prindible v. Prindible

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the standard set forth in Lynch, noting that it is a non-binding summary order failing to cite to Cantalino, which had already been decided at the time Lynch was decided
• denying qualified immunity on a malicious prosecution claim where \there was no basis for [the defendant officer] to believe that plaintiff had committed the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree\
• “[T]he elements of a malicious prosecution claim are identical under Section 1983 and New York law.”
• plaintiff's award incorporated damages for her imprisonment and certain economic damages, in addition to emotional distress
• “[I]n the context of a malicious prosecution claim, probable cause must relate to the specific crime charged in the criminal proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).