Prindeville v. People
Citations
- 42 Ill. 217
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal law—conviction, for a lesser offense under am, indictment for the greater. Where the prosecution must prove every fact necessary to constitute the lesser offense, together with the additional facts which make it the higher offense, in order to justify a conviction for the latter, then a conviction may be had for the lesser offense under an indictment for the greater.</p> <p>2. So, under an indictment for rape, a party may be convicted of an assault with intent to commit a rape.</p> <p>3. Bill op exceptions — when necessary. An objection to a rule of the court below respecting the time within which instructions must be presented to the court, under which certain instructions offered were refused, cannot be entertained on error unless the instructions are embodied in a bill of exceptions ; as, even if the rule was unreasonable, it would not be error to refuse instructions under it unless they were correct, which could not be determined if they were not befofe the court.</p> <p>4. Instructions—of special rules of court in respect to the time within ■ which they must be presented. Circuit Courts have the power, by reasonable and proper rules, to prescribe within what time, during the progress of a trial, instructions must be presented.</p>
Judges: Chibe, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The People v. OstrandIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 139×
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-30· cited 83×
- The People v. CallopyIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-10-24· cited 59×
- People v. S. D. S.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-08· cited 45×
- The PEOPLE v. KingIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-03-24· cited 27×
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1875-11-15· cited 23×
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. SanduskyIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-10-25· cited 22×
- People Ex Rel. Bernat v. BicekIllinois Supreme Court· 1950-03-22· cited 21×
- The PEOPLE v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-08-27· cited 14×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1885-11-15· cited 14×
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court· 1911-12-21· cited 14×
- People v. StronerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-26· cited 13×
- Illinois Central Railroad v. HaskinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1885-09-23· cited 13×
- Wright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1886-07-01· cited 12×
- People v. RainboltAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-08-19· cited 11×
- Dunn v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1937-11-08· cited 10×
- People v. SmalleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-10-25· cited 9×
- Frankfurter v. BryanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1883-01-30· cited 6×
- Lyman v. KlineAppellate Court of Illinois· 1906-10-08· cited 5×
- Buffehr v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1907-03-22· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.