Prince v. Walmart Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere possibility of a conflict of interest triggers duty to inquire
• holding that a criminal defendant is entitled 16 || under the Sixth Amendment to representation free from conflicts of interest
• recognizing that the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment entails “a correlative right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest”
• holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel entails “a correlative right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest”
• holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel includes “a correlative right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest”
• holding that mere possibility of a conflict of interest triggers duty to inquire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).