Prince v. State
Citations
- 44 Tex. 480
Syllabus
<p>1. Burglary.—It is not error, on a trial for burglary, to instruct the jury that the recent unexplained possession of property taken from the house is a fact to be considered by the jury with the other facts and circumstances to enable them to determine the question of guilt or innocence of the accused.</p> <p>2. Cumulative punishment.—Under the code there is no authority k in the District Court to fix the commencement of a term in the penitentiary at the expiration of another term.</p> <p>3. Term of punishment must begin from the date of the sentence; and a judgment otherwise will be corrected on appeal upon the original verdict.</p>
Judges: Reeves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re WalshNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-06-30· cited 33×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-12-20· cited 31×
- BretonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1899-05-29· cited 21×
- Ex Parte BellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1926-05-29· cited 17×
- Goodwill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-19· cited 4×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-06· cited 3×
- Mace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01· cited 1×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1888-06-02· cited 1×
- Mireles, Nicholas JaredCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-10
- Lanham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
- Hannahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Shumaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
- Henderson v. JamesOhio Supreme Court· 1895-02-05
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.