Prince v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here no evidentiary hearing is held below, we must accept the defendant’s factual allegations to the extent they are not refuted by the record.” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-17· cited 8×
• Kuder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-28· cited 1×
• PEREZ-OCEQUEDA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10
• MICHAEL W. HANEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-23
• Bynes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Leroux
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 196×
• Peede v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-08-19· cited 142×
• Kimbrough v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-06-24· cited 33×
• Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-12· cited 1×