Prince v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that following the cognizability prong, a postconviction court should determine a rule 3.800(a) claim's facial sufficiency before considering its merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MacAluso v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-28· cited 16×
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-19· cited 2×
• Ernest T. Keene v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-20
• Will Utile v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shortridge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-08· cited 232×
• Rinderer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-22· cited 11×
• Manies v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-03· cited 9×
• Ontiveros v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 7×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-23· cited 6×