Skip to main content
· 6/29/1961

Prince v. Nugent

Citations

  • 172 A.2d 743
  • 93 R.I. 149
  • 1961 R.I. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no constitutional violation because biological beneficiary’s rights were not vested and presumption is evidentiary rule with prospective application at time instrument is construed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Condon, Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.