· 6/29/1961
Prince v. Nugent
Citations
- 172 A.2d 743
- 93 R.I. 149
- 1961 R.I. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no constitutional violation because biological beneficiary’s rights were not vested and presumption is evidentiary rule with prospective application at time instrument is construed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Condon, Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.