Prince v. Jacoby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a school, through its ASB program, “created a limited public forum”
• noting that district can dispel any “mistaken inference of endorsement” by making it clear to students that private speech is not the speech of the school
• discussing Mergens and holding that “to the extent that [a] school allows ASB clubs [certain benefits], it cannot then discriminate against . . . clubs that seek the same [benefits]”
• discussing Mergens and holding that “to the extent that [a] school allows ASB clubs [certain benefits], it cannot then discriminate against . . . clubs that seek the same [benefits]”
• “Providing meeting space during student/staff time, school supplies and bus 14 transportation is not a direct payment to the [religious organization’s] coffers, even though it may 15 facilitate the [organization’s] own religious speech.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).