Skip to main content
· 7/15/1963

Prince v. Charles Ilfeld Company

Citations

  • 383 P.2d 827
  • 72 N.M. 351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]here must be something which amounts to an ouster, either actual notice or acts and conduct that will clearly indicate that the original permissive use has changed to one of an adverse character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Chavez, Moise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.