Prince v. Brydon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “knowledge, judgment, and assertions” reflected in private placement memorandum drafted by lawyer rendered lawyer’s aid material, not merely ministerial
• holding that an attorney can “materially aid” in the sale of a security under § 59.115(3) and may be held liable even if that attorney lacks knowledge of the unlawfulness of that sale
• ratifying Adams and explaining that under ORS § 59.115(3), “[t]he defense against strict liability” is “a showing of ignorance, not the professional role of the person who renders material aid in the unlawful sale”
• attorney who prepared documents may be liable under statute imposing liability on those who \participate or materially aid\ in a sale
• “The defense against strict liability [under ORS 59.115(3)], in short, was to be a showing of ignorance, not the professional role of the person who renders material aid in the unlawful sale.”
• interpreting Oregon Code § 59.115(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).