Prince of Peace Enterprises, Inc. v. Top Quality Food Market, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The parties have consented to application of New York law by briefing all issues under the law of New York.\ (citations omitted)
• “[A]s the beneficiary of a license agreement, and not of an assignment of ownership rights, POP lacks standing to bring its infringement claim.”
• “[T]he parties have consented to application of New York law by briefing all issues under the law of [N]ew York.”
• “[T]he law 12 regarding the formation of an enforceable agreement is the same in both jurisdictions [New York 13 and California]”
• “Absent a valid assignment transferring all ownership rights in a mark, even an exclusive licensee and distributor . . . is not a mark’s ‘owner’ for purposes of Section 43(c).”
• conclusory allegations that a claim was assigned fail to meet pleading requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).