Skip to main content
· 6/8/1999

Prince George's County v. Aluisi

Citations

  • 731 A.2d 888
  • 354 Md. 422
  • 1999 Md. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
  • concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
  • explaining that, pursuant to the Maryland Constitution, “the duties of the sheriffs are those prescribed by the • common law, the enactments of the General Assembly, and the rules of the Court of Appeals”
  • “[T]he process is extraordinary, and if the right be doubtful, or the duty discretionary, or of a nature to require the exercise of judgment, ... this writ will not be granted.”
  • “[T]he process is extraordinary, and if the right be doubtful, or the duty discretionary, or of a nature to require the exercise of judgment, . . . this writ will not be granted.”
  • cost of providing District Court security is to be borne by the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.