· 6/8/1999
Prince George's County v. Aluisi
Citations
- 731 A.2d 888
- 354 Md. 422
- 1999 Md. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
- concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
- explaining that, pursuant to the Maryland Constitution, “the duties of the sheriffs are those prescribed by the • common law, the enactments of the General Assembly, and the rules of the Court of Appeals”
- “[T]he process is extraordinary, and if the right be doubtful, or the duty discretionary, or of a nature to require the exercise of judgment, ... this writ will not be granted.”
- “[T]he process is extraordinary, and if the right be doubtful, or the duty discretionary, or of a nature to require the exercise of judgment, . . . this writ will not be granted.”
- cost of providing District Court security is to be borne by the State
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.