Prince Amun-Ra Meduty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “taken as a whole” requirement “ensures . . . that the matter is placed in context so that the jury can properly determine whether the work as a whole appeals to the prurient interest”
• finding no custody during an interview conducted after eight officers arrived at the defendant’s home to execute a search warrant
• stating that charging duplicitous counts is not a structural error
• stating to show duplicity error affected defendant’s substantial rights, he must show there was “a reasonable probability that the jury did not unanimously” agree on a single offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).