Primock v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Flanders v. Kochenberger, 118 Colo. 104, 193 P.2d 281 (1948), and Hatfield v. Barnes, 115 Colo. 30, 168 P.2d 552 (1946)
• \Any issue of [material] fact must be determined by the court or jury at a trial and should not be determined by the court on a motion for summary judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).