· 3/27/1997
Primex International Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Citations
- 679 N.E.2d 624
- 89 N.Y.2d 594
- 657 N.Y.S.2d 385
- 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Merger clauses are not mere boilerplate. They provide further protection for the interests of certainty and finality.”
- merger clause prohibits parole evidence to modify or contradict the express terms of the agreement
- general merger clause requires full application of the parol evidence rule in order to bar the introduction of extrinsic evidence to add to the terms of the writing
- “‘The fact that this other contract relates to what is, in important aspects, the same transaction, does not extend this [merger] paragraph to the destruction of that other [earlier] contract.’”
- giving conclusive effect to a merger clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.