Skip to main content
· 3/27/1997

Primex International Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 679 N.E.2d 624
  • 89 N.Y.2d 594
  • 657 N.Y.S.2d 385
  • 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Merger clauses are not mere boilerplate. They provide further protection for the interests of certainty and finality.”
  • merger clause prohibits parole evidence to modify or contradict the express terms of the agreement
  • general merger clause requires full application of the parol evidence rule in order to bar the introduction of extrinsic evidence to add to the terms of the writing
  • “‘The fact that this other contract relates to what is, in important aspects, the same transaction, does not extend this [merger] paragraph to the destruction of that other [earlier] contract.’”
  • giving conclusive effect to a merger clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.