PRIME TV, LLC. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding unsolicited fax advertisements constituted “property damage” under policy with language similar to the policy here
• insurer had duty to defend under “advertising injury” provision that covered “oral or written publication of material that violates a person’s right of privacy”
• insurer had duty to defend under “advertising injury” provision that covered “oral or written publication of material that violates a person’s right of privacy”
• insured’s act of faxing allegedly unsolicited advertisements was advertising injury within meaning of policy
• insured's act of faxing allegedly unsolicited advertisements was advertising injury within meaning of policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).