· 3/29/2010
Prime Time International Co. v. Vilsack
Citations
- 599 F.3d 678
- 389 U.S. App. D.C. 416
- 2010 WL 1133810
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Our primary concern in interpreting a statute is to determine and effectuate the legislature’s intent.” (citing Gmndmeyer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
- affirming dismissal of Information Quality Act challenge on different grounds without addressing argument that the statute creates no legal rights in third parties
- “For the purpose of this appeal, the court need only observe that USDA’s present interpretation is not mandated by the plain text of FETRA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Griffith, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.