Skip to main content
· 3/29/2010

Prime Time International Co. v. Vilsack

Citations

  • 599 F.3d 678
  • 389 U.S. App. D.C. 416
  • 2010 WL 1133810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our primary concern in interpreting a statute is to determine and effectuate the legislature’s intent.” (citing Gmndmeyer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
  • affirming dismissal of Information Quality Act challenge on different grounds without addressing argument that the statute creates no legal rights in third parties
  • “For the purpose of this appeal, the court need only observe that USDA’s present interpretation is not mandated by the plain text of FETRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Griffith, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.