PRIME PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE INC. v. ALLIED TRUCKING OF FLORIDA, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court was “unwilling to countenance” a theory whereby “[t]he existence of injured parties who might not wish to bring suit becomes irrelevant”
• requiring that requested relief be likely, but not certain, to alleviate harm complained of
• stating that the complaint must fall within the interests to be protected or regulated by the statute at issue
• explaining that “[tjhe term ‘standing’ subsumes a blend of constitutional requirements and prudential considerations”
• requiring that requested relief be likely, but not certain, to alleviate harm complained of
• holding residents of Maryland and Virginia with organizational headquarters in Washington, D.C. lacked standing to challenge a property transfer in Pennsylvania in part because they lived beyond the community where the challenged law applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).