Prime Medica Associates v. Valley Forge Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that orders denying post-trial motions are interlocutory and not ordinarily appealable, but the subsequent judgment is appealable
• explaining that an order denying post-trial motions is interlocutory and not appealable until entry of final judgment
• applying Pa.R.A.P. 905(a)(5) and treating premature notices of appeal as “relat[ing] forward to . . . the date judgment was entered and copies of the judgment were distributed to all the appropriate parties”
• finding denials of post-trial motions to be “interlocutory and generally not appealable”
• reversing judgment in favor of insured because insured failed to commence suit for failure to pay casualty and vandalism losses within the two-year limitations period from the date of loss set forth in the insurance contract
• “A final judgment entered during the pendency of an appeal is sufficient to perfect appellate jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).