PRIME EAGLE GROUP LTD. v. Steel Dynamics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where the plaintiff “waited more than four years after” the claimed tolling period ended, that the plaintiff had “been anything but diligent and cannot use equitable tolling to justify the untimely filing”
• “Normally knowledge of who injured you is essential, in addition to knowledge of the injury’s existence.”
• “Normally knowledge of who injured you is essential, in addition to knowledge of the injury’s existence.”
• “[Nakornthai’s president] knew in 1998 that Steel Dynamics was not giving Nakornthai accurate information; therefore Nakornthai itself knew this.”
• “Equitable tolling does not restart the period of limitations … Instead it permits deferral of suit until the tolling event ceases and requires diligent action thereafter.”
• “agency recognizes only two exceptions to the proposition that an employee’s knowledge of a matter within the scope of his duties is imputed to the employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).