Primax Recoveries, Inc. v. Joan Gunter and William Gunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a plaintiff is a participant within the meaning of ERISA is not relevant to a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that whether a plaintiff is a participant within the meaning of ERISA is not relevant to a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that two recent Supreme Court decisions overrule panel precedent confusing so-called “statutory standing” with subject-matter jurisdiction
• intervening Supreme Court decisions interpreting Federal Rules of Bankruptcy and Criminal Procedure addressing term “jurisdiction” caused this court to revisit whether it lacked jurisdiction over an ERISA claim
• intervening Supreme Court decisions interpreting Federal Rules of Bankruptcy and Criminal Procedure addressing term “jurisdiction” caused this court to revisit whether it lacked jurisdiction over an ERISA claim
• characterizing the dismissal of a claim under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).